The capacity of U.S. society to confront nuclear risks, viewed though a planned geological repository for radioactive waste.
Probing public opinion on the use of low-yield nuclear weapons.
Unpacking the current transition in European policy and debates on defense and security.
Reflections on the U.S.-Israel war on Iran and its ramifications for future diplomacy.
Scientists have studied the global consequences of nuclear war since the 1940s. This resource guide — for researchers, teachers and students — maps key studies, current research, and core questions on the environmental effects of nuclear war.
The grant will support SGS in scientific and technical research, critical policy analysis, education, and outreach to enable and advance national and international policies for nuclear disarmament, arms control, and nonproliferation to support a safer and more peaceful world.
In the coming year, the panel will review existing verification technologies and mechanisms, seek to identify gaps that would need to be filled, and recommend future R&D strategies to fill these gaps.
The SGS workshop, co-organized with the Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy (IFSH), gathered international missile defense experts to assess US plans for its Golden Dome system.
The Fellows will create science communication content aimed to inspire greater public trust in scientific institutions, while also generating public excitement about scientific research.
SGS together with the Princeton School of Public and International Affairs (SPIA) hosted a public lecture "Reflections on the June 2025 US Attacks on Iran: Causes, Consequences, and the Future of US-Iran Relations" by Seyed Hossein Mousavian.
